|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who chooses?: lunchbox dilemma New Zealand’s Parliament and government put a lot of effort into policies and funding to encourage healthy eating, and discourage obesity and other lifestyle diseases. The school lunch programme for elementary students, run by teachers, nutritionists and other officials in Wellington’s sister city, Sakai, and Sakai City’s approach to recycling and waste management, shows how others use central and local government to help meet such challenges. There are some things people just do. There are some things where it is a matter of choice as to whether governments should get involved.
Japanese are one of the slimmest peoples in the world, ranked 163 out of 190 countries by the WHO. Japan’s population has 22.6 per cent classified as obese. New Zealand is ranked 17th most obese – 58.4% of our people are obese. What do some Japanese primary school children get given in school lunches? Who provides some of the lunchboxes? A typical bento (lunch box) at schools in Sakai is rice or bread, miso or Chinese soup, salad, some meat dish and milk. Fruit, not provided everyday, might be a fruit salad including kiwifruit. Meat, usually daily, may include beef, chicken or pork – from domestic providers. Milk comes in paper cartons, cheese is provided sometimes in cooking, sometimes in sticks. The nutritionist plans to provide 650 calories in each day’s school lunch. Central government lays down policies that influence the school lunch programme – health officials prescribe the calorie level, trade officials encourage local officials to buy locally produced foods. The local government staffs who provide the school lunch programme aim to educate kids to educate parents. The Sakai nutritionist says there is a rising problem of children not eating breakfast - maybe due to mothers working outside home more. She says it is a controversial idea for school to provide breakfast (we don’t know of any who do!eds.). Newsletters go to parents about breakfast recipes, and parents are sometimes invited to join in school lunches. Food pyramids, part of nutrition education in Sakai City and other places accentuate the nutritional value of each category. For example: Some sushi retailers in New Zealand are promoting the health giving features of foods that are used to make sushi, from rice to fish.
We asked people responsible for a Sakai City school lunch programme, and were told: We are required to use domestic beef. Sakai does not have control over whether it is domestic or foreign beef. Who makes the requirement to buy domestically? The government makes requirement for all the country. The requirement is not law. (At Takashimaya Sakai department store a shop manager says consumers prefer domestic produce.)
(At Ritsumeikan University economics Prof Matsubara spoke
of sensitivities adding government barriers to New Zealand milk, cheese,
apple and beef imports.) We asked Sakai’s Mahara ward nutritionist what sort
of obesity problem Sakai people have. With these comments about attitudes, pressures and choices being made by governments, nutritionists, parents and students, it came as little surprise to hear others’ views on healthy foods in Kansai. Former Kiwi JET at Sakai City Hall, Jason Allen sees growing Japanese interest in healthy foods. Osaka Chamber of Commerce and Industry international director says citizens now wish to take care of health. Kansai Television’s manager says the television channel’s content is all about living. So in an era when New Zealand’s government has decided obesity is a public health challenge, Sakai City’s school lunch programme raises for Kiwis the question, who chooses our lunches? From Anthony Haas, Asia Pacific Economic News service 18 March 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A DecisionMaker publication |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Search powered by: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||